Well, your spot on with this one, but I’m still waiting for to defend your position. This burn out idiot is the author of:
Big Trouble in Little Washington
Anatomy of a Crisis
The myth of FDR, as well as a few others on Filibuster.
Now that you know who you’re up against, defend your assertions!
Or, will you simply resort to insults, accuse me of dodging questions you did not ask, while completely avoiding mine?
I’m right here meeting you head-on! Will you run? I’ll have to call a chicken-#### candy-ass if you do, and I’d be right.
Please back up your assertion that Ron Paul is a racist and a homophobe with more than “I said so”.
Defend your assertion that the War on Drugs is a liberal thing.
And, I WILL expose you for a nationalist, and you’re going to help me do it! I will expose the inevitable contradictory statements that you most certainly will make.
C’mon Sal, bring it! I’ll tell you right now…you don’t have the knowledge base for it. Maybe in a few years you might be able to give me a real debate, but right now, I’ll light you up like a Xmas tree.
I await your insults and complete lack of substance!
posted by: Four Twenty · 1/27/09
Check the end of this article. If you’re an author….go write your own stuff. Did you just remember you wrote some stuff here? Is your short term memory screwing your mind up?
posted by: Sal Traina · 1/27/09
Sal, my good man, love your work here by the way, don’t let this stuff get yo you. Emotions get in the way, just keep defending you position and you’ll be fine. You’re going to get attacked from time to time, respond just as you would to a reasoned, respectful, well thought out, comment. Defend, defend, and DEFEND, then counter. .
“I’ll light you up like a Xmas tree.” <——- nice respectful, reasoned, thought out comment.
posted by: Sal Traina · 1/27/09
Look who’s talking! And if you check your comments, you were being pissy with someone who submitted a comment. I was trying to convince to drop that crap and defend your position instead of resorting to insults. It didn’t work, You continue to pursue that strategy and it’s unprofessional, even for this blog.
“I’ll light you up like a Xmas tree” vs “coward”, “#####”, “idiot burn out” and your going to lecture me on respect? BLAH-HA-HA! You’re a hoot.
My comments are now subject to moderation, I find that funny. I guess signing in as “pee in 420’s butt” is completely acceptable, but confronting you is not! ROFL!
posted by: Four Twenty · 1/27/09
I only post as Sal. I posted another topic, and you followed me there to rant and rave about your man crush on Ron Paul. Very unprofessional. Write your own blogs buddy. Get over it. Lit up your bong like a Christmas tree, and move on. You lost.
posted by: Sal Traina · 1/27/09
Try posting as your real name…George Regal, and you wont get in trouble…and I’m the coward? I’m not hiding under another name.
Out of respect for Andru..I will stop…Keep it up if you like.
posted by: Sal Traina · 1/27/09
2nd attempt to post this:
Ah yes, the newsletter, it’s been addressed time and again. Was it stupid to allow his name to be attached to newsletter without oversight? You betcha!
From one of links YOU provided:
“This is the second “paper” on the recent SMEAR (caps added) campaign against 2008 Presidential candidate Ron Paul. To see the other papers please visit the main page.
These smears are formed by taking quotes out of newsletters, which were published, BUT NOT WRITTEN (caps added), by Ron Paul from 1978 to 1995.”
“When taken out of it’s proper context you would think the writer is saying that he detests the gay lifestyle so much that he believes that society would be better off with gays remaining in the closet. That they should be hidden from view because they are second class citizens. This is the intended purpose of the slanderer, to make it seem to be something it is not.
The complete quote shows something quite different:”
Did you read this, or did you just grab things you thought would back you up? This is a DEFENSE of Ron Paul, not an attack. Thanks for the assist Sal!
Do you have anything that came out of his mouth, or was written by him? No you don’t.
xhttp://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PvFLSwDvBUA (Remove the “x” I don’t think it likes this link)
Yep, more insults, glad to see you’re still intellectually bankrupt.
Care to deal with assertion about the war on drugs now? I doubt it.
Keep trying Sal, you’ll keep helping me out.
posted by: Four Twenty · 1/27/09
What does this have to do with Adrian Rogers?
posted by: Sal Traina · 1/27/09
This is my original Gear Live ID, my other one didn’t work when I tried it, Sue me!
Deal with the content if you can.
posted by: Four Twenty · 1/27/09
yeah, that hurts. I’m reeling!
posted by: Four Twenty · 1/27/09
My posts get the most views, the most positive and negative feedback, and I’m a more frequent poster. Maybe one day, you’ll stop getting high, and you’ll be as respected here as I am. Good luck with that Cheech…or are you Chong. I bet mommy and daddy are proud. Get over yourself, and your obsession with 420, and the Liberal War On Drugs, and try writing your own damn blogs. and you call yourself an author..The only thing i see is you as the author of off topic comments.
posted by: Sal Traina · 1/27/09
Ok I’m done. I had fun with you, and getting your panties in a bunch about Ron Paul. Let this be a lesson to you. Stay off the weed, so you get your memory back. On Oct. 2, 2008, I wrote a blog supporting Ron Paul. God, you’re naive. I’m sure one day, you’ll look back at this, while you’re in rehab somewhere, and you’ll be kicking yourself in the ass…..because you’ve been had. A lot of people here, and all over the www can vouch for me and my cleverness, and my pranks. In the words of Willy Wonka.. “You lose, you get nothing, good day sir!”
You’re done because you’re losing. Your assertion that the War on Drugs was a liberal thing was blown out of the water, unless you want call Reagan a liberal that is.
You post links that back up my assertion that the claim of racism against Ron Paul is a smear campaign. Way to go there Sal!
And now, you want to use your column on Ron Paul as proof you think he’s OK? You spent numerous comments attacking him, now you want to show you support him, is that it?
You have nothing but insults and garbage. So, instead of defending yourself you want to tell me people will vouche for you and your cleverness? ROFL!
The only person that thinks you got the best of me, is YOU, and perhaps a few of your cronies. I can assure you that anyone who knows what a debate is, knows you’re losing.
How about some more links that agree with me, that sure would be clever!
posted by: Four Twenty · 1/27/09
You obviously don’t get the joke. I thought weed smokers were always giddy and had a sense of humor. Look..if your posts were any good..we’d be on them going back and forth….keep swinging from my sack buddy. Thanks for making my views high. By sack, I don’ mean a twenty sack of weed, and by high…..ugh..never mind idiot. Goodnight pothead.
posted by: Sal Traina · 1/28/09
Still avoiding your absurd assertion that the War on Drugs is a liberal thing?
You know you got caught, and you can’t get out of it. You got caught not reading the links you posted and helped make my case for me, and you can’t get out of that either.
Now you’re trying to do a 180 on Ron Paul, and that won’t work either.
Did you go to the Sean Hannity, Bill O’Reilly School of Debate? Hurl insults and declare victory?
Poor Sal.
posted by: Four Twenty · 1/28/09
A Blog Within A Blog
When it comes to blogs, people can use big words, and make some interesting posts to look intelligent, but what site owners want to see is hits. When someone has 6 blog entries that only total 70 views all together, it’s just a waste of time….especially when compared to this blog alone, which drew over 200 views already. The author of this blog has entries here with well over 8000 hits. This author draws good, and bad reviews…views from all sides. That’s what people want. People don’t want to see a know-at-all blog lurker that is in a weed-induced jealous fit. Seriously, buddy, find a new hobby.
Comments
Well, your spot on with this one, but I’m still waiting for to defend your position. This burn out idiot is the author of:
Big Trouble in Little Washington
Anatomy of a Crisis
The myth of FDR, as well as a few others on Filibuster.
Now that you know who you’re up against, defend your assertions!
Or, will you simply resort to insults, accuse me of dodging questions you did not ask, while completely avoiding mine?
I’m right here meeting you head-on! Will you run? I’ll have to call a chicken-#### candy-ass if you do, and I’d be right.
Please back up your assertion that Ron Paul is a racist and a homophobe with more than “I said so”.
Defend your assertion that the War on Drugs is a liberal thing.
And, I WILL expose you for a nationalist, and you’re going to help me do it! I will expose the inevitable contradictory statements that you most certainly will make.
C’mon Sal, bring it! I’ll tell you right now…you don’t have the knowledge base for it. Maybe in a few years you might be able to give me a real debate, but right now, I’ll light you up like a Xmas tree.
I await your insults and complete lack of substance!
posted by: Four Twenty · 1/27/09
Check the end of this article. If you’re an author….go write your own stuff. Did you just remember you wrote some stuff here? Is your short term memory screwing your mind up?
posted by: Sal Traina · 1/27/09
Sal, my good man, love your work here by the way, don’t let this stuff get yo you. Emotions get in the way, just keep defending you position and you’ll be fine. You’re going to get attacked from time to time, respond just as you would to a reasoned, respectful, well thought out, comment. Defend, defend, and DEFEND, then counter. .
“I’ll light you up like a Xmas tree.” <——- nice respectful, reasoned, thought out comment.
posted by: Sal Traina · 1/27/09
Look who’s talking! And if you check your comments, you were being pissy with someone who submitted a comment. I was trying to convince to drop that crap and defend your position instead of resorting to insults. It didn’t work, You continue to pursue that strategy and it’s unprofessional, even for this blog.
“I’ll light you up like a Xmas tree” vs “coward”, “#####”, “idiot burn out” and your going to lecture me on respect? BLAH-HA-HA! You’re a hoot.
My comments are now subject to moderation, I find that funny. I guess signing in as “pee in 420’s butt” is completely acceptable, but confronting you is not! ROFL!
posted by: Four Twenty · 1/27/09
I only post as Sal. I posted another topic, and you followed me there to rant and rave about your man crush on Ron Paul. Very unprofessional. Write your own blogs buddy. Get over it. Lit up your bong like a Christmas tree, and move on. You lost.
posted by: Sal Traina · 1/27/09
Try posting as your real name…George Regal, and you wont get in trouble…and I’m the coward? I’m not hiding under another name.
Out of respect for Andru..I will stop…Keep it up if you like.
posted by: Sal Traina · 1/27/09
2nd attempt to post this:
Ah yes, the newsletter, it’s been addressed time and again. Was it stupid to allow his name to be attached to newsletter without oversight? You betcha!
From one of links YOU provided:
“This is the second “paper” on the recent SMEAR (caps added) campaign against 2008 Presidential candidate Ron Paul. To see the other papers please visit the main page.
These smears are formed by taking quotes out of newsletters, which were published, BUT NOT WRITTEN (caps added), by Ron Paul from 1978 to 1995.”
http://www.criticalreactor.com/2008/01/28/ron-paul-slanders-exposed-i-miss-the-closet
It gets better…
“When taken out of it’s proper context you would think the writer is saying that he detests the gay lifestyle so much that he believes that society would be better off with gays remaining in the closet. That they should be hidden from view because they are second class citizens. This is the intended purpose of the slanderer, to make it seem to be something it is not.
The complete quote shows something quite different:”
Did you read this, or did you just grab things you thought would back you up? This is a DEFENSE of Ron Paul, not an attack. Thanks for the assist Sal!
Do you have anything that came out of his mouth, or was written by him? No you don’t.
xhttp://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PvFLSwDvBUA (Remove the “x” I don’t think it likes this link)
Yep, more insults, glad to see you’re still intellectually bankrupt.
Care to deal with assertion about the war on drugs now? I doubt it.
Keep trying Sal, you’ll keep helping me out.
posted by: Four Twenty · 1/27/09
What does this have to do with Adrian Rogers?
posted by: Sal Traina · 1/27/09
This is my original Gear Live ID, my other one didn’t work when I tried it, Sue me!
Deal with the content if you can.
posted by: Four Twenty · 1/27/09
yeah, that hurts. I’m reeling!
posted by: Four Twenty · 1/27/09
My posts get the most views, the most positive and negative feedback, and I’m a more frequent poster. Maybe one day, you’ll stop getting high, and you’ll be as respected here as I am. Good luck with that Cheech…or are you Chong. I bet mommy and daddy are proud. Get over yourself, and your obsession with 420, and the Liberal War On Drugs, and try writing your own damn blogs. and you call yourself an author..The only thing i see is you as the author of off topic comments.
posted by: Sal Traina · 1/27/09
Ok I’m done. I had fun with you, and getting your panties in a bunch about Ron Paul. Let this be a lesson to you. Stay off the weed, so you get your memory back. On Oct. 2, 2008, I wrote a blog supporting Ron Paul. God, you’re naive. I’m sure one day, you’ll look back at this, while you’re in rehab somewhere, and you’ll be kicking yourself in the ass…..because you’ve been had. A lot of people here, and all over the www can vouch for me and my cleverness, and my pranks. In the words of Willy Wonka.. “You lose, you get nothing, good day sir!”
http://politics.gearlive.com/filibustersoup/article/q308-do-people-give-ron-paul-enough-credit-10041145/
Seriously…write a blog.
posted by: Sal Traina · 1/27/09
You’re done because you’re losing. Your assertion that the War on Drugs was a liberal thing was blown out of the water, unless you want call Reagan a liberal that is.
You post links that back up my assertion that the claim of racism against Ron Paul is a smear campaign. Way to go there Sal!
And now, you want to use your column on Ron Paul as proof you think he’s OK? You spent numerous comments attacking him, now you want to show you support him, is that it?
You have nothing but insults and garbage. So, instead of defending yourself you want to tell me people will vouche for you and your cleverness? ROFL!
The only person that thinks you got the best of me, is YOU, and perhaps a few of your cronies. I can assure you that anyone who knows what a debate is, knows you’re losing.
How about some more links that agree with me, that sure would be clever!
posted by: Four Twenty · 1/27/09
You obviously don’t get the joke. I thought weed smokers were always giddy and had a sense of humor. Look..if your posts were any good..we’d be on them going back and forth….keep swinging from my sack buddy. Thanks for making my views high. By sack, I don’ mean a twenty sack of weed, and by high…..ugh..never mind idiot. Goodnight pothead.
posted by: Sal Traina · 1/28/09
Still avoiding your absurd assertion that the War on Drugs is a liberal thing?
You know you got caught, and you can’t get out of it. You got caught not reading the links you posted and helped make my case for me, and you can’t get out of that either.
Now you’re trying to do a 180 on Ron Paul, and that won’t work either.
Did you go to the Sean Hannity, Bill O’Reilly School of Debate? Hurl insults and declare victory?
Poor Sal.
posted by: Four Twenty · 1/28/09
A Blog Within A Blog
When it comes to blogs, people can use big words, and make some interesting posts to look intelligent, but what site owners want to see is hits. When someone has 6 blog entries that only total 70 views all together, it’s just a waste of time….especially when compared to this blog alone, which drew over 200 views already. The author of this blog has entries here with well over 8000 hits. This author draws good, and bad reviews…views from all sides. That’s what people want. People don’t want to see a know-at-all blog lurker that is in a weed-induced jealous fit. Seriously, buddy, find a new hobby.
posted by: Sal Traina · 1/28/09
I feel so conceited typing in 3rd person! HA!
posted by: Sal Traina · 1/28/09
I don’t even do drugs.
posted by: Sal Traina · 1/28/09