DSL speeds
Posted: 10 May 2005 07:52 AM     [ Ignore ]  
In The Club
Total Posts:  333
Joined  2004-08-04

Does anyone know if a 384k upstream is enough to support a single website that averages between 100 - 300 hits a day, and still maintain a decent load speed?  The entire site is java, and excluding the java lib directory the entire site is only 6mb in files/images.

The site is not image heavy either.  And overall bandwidth usage on a monthly/yearly bases isn’t an issue.  Just wasn’t sure if 384k would be enough to push the site decently during busy times of day.

Profile
 
Posted: 10 May 2005 09:39 AM   [ # 1 ]     [ Ignore ]   [ # 1 ]  
Board Apprentice
Total Posts:  1095
Joined  2005-07-06

no, need more bandwidth.

Profile
 
Posted: 10 May 2005 10:21 AM   [ # 2 ]     [ Ignore ]   [ # 2 ]  
In The Club
Total Posts:  333
Joined  2004-08-04

would you mind giving a little more of an explanation as to why?  I’m sure its not enough.  just wanted to get some actual numbers and what not to support my thoughts.

Profile
 
Posted: 10 May 2005 11:11 AM   [ # 3 ]     [ Ignore ]   [ # 3 ]  
In The Club
Total Posts:  198
Joined  2006-01-03

you had better check… most ISP’s will not let you run a server on their lines, cause thats “commercial” use. Also, short answer for the bandwidth: nope. You need more.

Profile
 
Posted: 10 May 2005 11:46 AM   [ # 4 ]     [ Ignore ]   [ # 4 ]  
In The Club
Total Posts:  333
Joined  2004-08-04

bandwidth usage/throughput with the ISP isn’t an issue.

Profile
 
Posted: 10 May 2005 01:52 PM   [ # 5 ]     [ Ignore ]   [ # 5 ]  
Board Apprentice
Total Posts:  1095
Joined  2005-07-06

[quote author=“stuthemonkey”]Does anyone know if a 384k upstream is enough to support a single website that averages between 100 - 300 hits a day, and still maintain a decent load speed?  The entire site is java, and excluding the java lib directory the entire site is only 6mb in files/images.

The site is not image heavy either.  And overall bandwidth usage on a monthly/yearly bases isn’t an issue.  Just wasn’t sure if 384k would be enough to push the site decently during busy times of day.

384 Kb is 48 KB if you can even reach that speed, most cases u wont. Take this example: lets say you have a web page that is 2 KB and then you have four images on it that are 5 KB now thats 22 KB of bandwidth for one page loaded by one user, roughly half of your 48 KB. Now you said 100-300 hits a day, so if lets say 15 users access your site at the same time, they are consuming 330 KB at one exact moment. You can only upload 48 KB. Now no user will stay on the same page for a huge amount of time, if you have that many people visiting your website they will be hoping all over the place and as you can see above, there will be huge lag. Imagine if the users browse all of your 6 MB site? When a website is taking long to load what to people do? Leave!

In short, ADSL connections are not meant for putting up a web server. If you want to setup a web server, get a managed server from a web hosting company that allows you to setup ur own thing, or get yourself a faster connection. Not even a cable modem would work for that many hits a day.

Profile
 
Posted: 10 May 2005 03:59 PM   [ # 6 ]     [ Ignore ]   [ # 6 ]  
In The Club
Total Posts:  333
Joined  2004-08-04

Now thats the kind of answer I was looking for.

Thanks for the help.

Profile
 
Posted: 12 May 2005 08:37 AM   [ # 7 ]     [ Ignore ]   [ # 7 ]  
In The Club
Total Posts:  333
Joined  2004-08-04

looks like I found a solution to my problem if anyone is interested.  I’m moving my server into the DMZ of the isp that was going to allow me to host over my dsl line.  I’ll have full remote control of the box itself, and physical access to it by calling and scheduling a time.

Not too bad.  The company runs off of 3 partial T3’s.  So I don’t think I’ll have any speed issues with that.

Profile