Tuesday September 25, 2007 3:45 pm
Discovery to air recut Man vs. Wild episodes
It’s a long-running argument…discussion…whatever. Where did the first roots of reality TV really get placed? MTV gets credited for The Real World, but some say CBS revolutionized the genre with shows like Survivor. Reality TV is very loosely defined as “unscripted,” and that means reality really extends back way before cable even existed. News broadcasts, even game shows can be called reality. And in the very earliest days of game shows, when on-screen competition was born, scandal marred the public view of television. The quiz shows were fixed, and the way the public looked at television was for ever changed. Today, most of us accept that not all reality TV is really real. Still…it comes as a surprise when we find that some shows are truly not at all what they seem. And now, the Discovery Channel is getting ready to eat crow. Or maybe ratings.
Read More | AOL News
Beginning Monday, the Discovery Channel started airing re-edited versions of Man vs. Wild, a popular (for the channel) show about a man in the wilderness honing his own survival instincts. The re-edited versions of each episode are being released as part of a cable TV mea culpa. You see, “some elements” of the show were faked. Star Bear Grylls spent some nights at a motel and received some off-camera assistance when constructing structures (rafts, bridges, shelters, etc.). The cable channel has admitted that “some episodes were not natural to the environment.” The re-edited episodes are being aired with a disclaimer and new voice-overs from Bear Grylls.
A team at the Discovery Channel has been carefully reviewing episodes of Man vs. Wild, editing those elements that aren’t “natural to the environment.” The list of elements that were changed for the show goes on and on. During one episode, Grylls was shown cooking a rabbit he’d purportedly caught, a rabbit that was really given to him by the crew. A rock-climbing scene was actually performed with a technical harness, and some nights that showed Grylls bedding down in the wilderness were actually spent at the comfort of a nearby motel. Man vs. Wild, the second season, is already in production and will begin on Nov. 16. The now dubious nature of the show has cast an unsavory light on the rest of the Discovery Channel’s programming. Another popular show on the channel, Survivorman, is built on the exact same plot as Man vs. Wild. Is one more valid than the other? So far, Discovery hasn’t breathed a word that any other show on the channel is anything less than reality…but the channel has, at least, admitted that everything is not quite what it seems. How far does the fix extend?
- Related Tags:
- bear grylls, discovery, discovery channel, fake, fixed, man vs. wild, not natural, survivorman, unnatural, unscripted
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
© Gear Live Media, LLC. 2007 – User-posted content, unless source is quoted, is licensed under a Creative Commons Public Domain License. Gear Live graphics, logos, designs, page headers, button icons, videos, articles, blogs, forums, scripts and other service names are the trademarks of Gear Live Inc.
Comments:
It begs one question: What do we value as viewers—educational properties or authenticity? The purpose of the show is to educate people about the dangers of the wilderness and how to survive them. Grylls is still providing important information, but Discovery has chosen to dramatize the avenue through which that information reaches the public.
I personally don’t mind the controversy. The show is compelling and educational despite the façade.