On TV Envy: The Biggest Loser Recap: The Season of No Excuses Begins

Cynthia Guenthner

Biography

About Me

  • Latest Comments
  • I totally agree with you 2LB. Sykes' so-called "humor" is anything but funny. Can you imagine the outcry there would have been if, when George W. Bush was President, a Republican had even tactfully criticized the opposition at the White House Correspondents' Dinner? Obama could have, at the least, remarked that Sykes' comments were inappropriate and distanced himself from her hate speech.

    Wanda Sykes roasts Obama, Bush, Cheney, and more
    Posted on: May 17, 2009 at 2:06 pm on Filibuster Soup - 10 comments total

  • You state, "Though it will be a privilege to hear from the President each week (President Bush's lack of communication with the American people. . .) Throughout his nearly 8 years in office, President Bush has given a weekly radio address.

    Obama's First Weekly Address Goes Virtual
    Posted on: November 18, 2008 at 4:47 pm on Filibuster Soup - 1 comments total

  • Sorry, I should have said YOUR analogy to algebra. Picky readers around here.

    Can We Expect a Return of the Fairness Doctrine?
    Posted on: November 18, 2008 at 3:14 pm on Filibuster Soup - 13 comments total

  • Angry person? Have you ever seen the look in Newdow's eyes? He's filled with hatred toward God, whom he refuses to acknowledge exists. Why are people atheists? I believe they don't want to live up to moral standards, so they refuse to admit there might be something other than only the material world. Evolution (macro-evolution, if you know what that means), is a THEORY. There is no way possible to PROVE it to be factual. The scientists who test the hypothesis would have to have been there millions of years ago to witness it. Impossible. No one disputes micro-evolution (changes within the species.) You analogy to algebra simply is not accurate. Who spreads lies about the Founding Fathers? Read the Declaration of Independence.

    Can We Expect a Return of the Fairness Doctrine?
    Posted on: November 18, 2008 at 3:12 pm on Filibuster Soup - 13 comments total

  • Sorry, I mistyped "belief" as "beliefe". Thought I'd get to that before some wise guy caught it.

    Can We Expect a Return of the Fairness Doctrine?
    Posted on: November 17, 2008 at 5:33 pm on Filibuster Soup - 13 comments total

  • First off, my dictionary defines "bigot" as "A person who is rigidly devoted to his own group, religion, race, or politics and is intolerant of those who differ." The word "religion" means "belief," so I think I used the word in the proper context. Second, Michael Newdow was never even MARRIED to his "daughter's" mother. So he never has had legal custody of her. Seems like he just wants to get even with the girl and her mother because they are Christians. He wants to dictate to his "daughter" even though he doesn't want to assume the legal obligations of parenthood. Why does he want "In God We Trust" removed from money? Because he doesn't want it to offend his "daughter"? I don't have any children, so that's a moot question. But come to think of it, I had to endure the preaching of "evolution" in science class. And secularism (a beliefe) is disguised as "science". What about the Constitutional idea (paraphrased) that states the government should not "prohibit the free exercise of" religion? And apparently the writers of the Declaration of Independence didn't agree with your definition of "fairness", as they often referred to "Providence" or a Supreme Being. If you despise the conservative talk show hosts and claim you're not a liberal, then what are you? Probably more radical--like a Marxist who would feel more at home in a country where God is out of the government and the citizens are afraid to even practice their religion. By the way, what's NEURALITY?

    Can We Expect a Return of the Fairness Doctrine?
    Posted on: November 17, 2008 at 5:30 pm on Filibuster Soup - 13 comments total

  • If you look in your dictionary, you will find that bigotry is defined as intolerant of others' beliefs. If you don't think Newdow is intolerant of religious views other than his secularism, there's something wrong with your so-called "intellectual" thinking. He wants to do away with all references to God in this society. So what, maybe I wrote Glenn Back instead of Beck, but you know what I meant (you're so brilliant and perfect). And since when do you have to be an atheist or radical left-wing to be considered "intellectual"? I guess you liberals think it's o.k. to be intolerant of only conservative Christianity.

    Can We Expect a Return of the Fairness Doctrine?
    Posted on: November 17, 2008 at 9:51 am on Filibuster Soup - 13 comments total

  • Too bad the reporter wasn't Keith Olbermann.

    Barney's Bite--His Farewell to the White House Media
    Posted on: November 08, 2008 at 8:54 am on Filibuster Soup - 2 comments total

  • I'm probably one of the few who visit this board who actually remembers Mr. Reagan's upbeat speech. And following Goldwater's defeat, conservatives were as depressed as they are today. I also remember this same feeling after Clinton defeated George H. W. Bush. Thanks for helping me to get out of the doldrums, Sal, but it's going to take some time. Ronald Reagan is still one of my greatest inspirations.

    Learn From History
    Posted on: November 07, 2008 at 3:09 pm on Filibuster Soup - 1 comments total

  • I don't believe John is telling you you're stupid. He's just echoing what conservatives believe about socialism. Obama's voting record (when he doesn't just vote "present") is the most liberal in the Senate. "Spreading the wealth around" is a euphemism for socialism. Yes, a new generation has voted. But there are plenty of us who've been around for a while who voted as well. Obama did not receive a mandate.

    President-Elect of the United States of America: Barack Obama
    Posted on: November 07, 2008 at 3:04 pm on Filibuster Soup - 6 comments total

  • President Bush did not defeat Proposition 8 in CA. The voters did. Maybe if you get your mind out of the toilet you'd realize this.

    We Will Be Back In Strength
    Posted on: November 07, 2008 at 2:55 pm on Filibuster Soup - 4 comments total

  • This goofy post has nothing whatsoever to do with Sal's blog. Why don't you post your own blog.

    We Will Be Back In Strength
    Posted on: November 05, 2008 at 3:21 pm on Filibuster Soup - 4 comments total

  • You state that "evolution [is] a fact about the world on which we are able to make tremendous medical progress." First off, if any scientist has ever proven "evolution" (macro-evolution, that is) to be a "fact", that's news to me. It's been a theory from the start. To prove it as a fact, you'd have to have been there millions of years ago. Were you? I don't see how "macro-evolution" has contributed to medical progress. No one disputes "micro-evolution", but I don't know if you're aware of the difference between the two. (Oh, you must. Liberals are not ignorant.) You're just arrogant. You can't prove religion is fiction either.

    People Wonder Why Obama Is Called "Radical"
    Posted on: November 03, 2008 at 5:32 pm on Filibuster Soup - 41 comments total

  • I am appalled that anyone has the nerve to state, "McCain admits in the year 2008 he cannot use a computer to send email." Mr. McCain's physical disabilities are the result of his unselfish service to his country and enduring over 5 years of hell as a POW, fighting to preserve the freedoms of callous, ungrateful people like you to spout off your mouths and criticize their leaders without fear of ending up in jail or the guillotine. It's true--John McCain is the only candidate who ever fought for his country.

    People Wonder Why Obama Is Called "Radical"
    Posted on: November 03, 2008 at 5:22 pm on Filibuster Soup - 41 comments total

  • He uses common sense and gets to the point. I agree he would have been an asset if the McCain campaign had used his talents.

    Zo Black & Right
    Posted on: November 03, 2008 at 9:32 am on Filibuster Soup - 1 comments total

  • Page 1 of 2 pages  1 2 >

Advertisement