Latest Gear Live Videos
Friday October 6, 2006 12:09 pm
New Statute May End Online Gambling
Like your bingo online? It may soon stop existing now that an Internet gambling ban has been approved by Congress. The ban was attached as a rider to a port security bill and is currently sitting on the desk of President Bush. Professor of Law I. Nelson Rose, in his article “Gambling and the Law®,” translates for us non-legal types:
“Although the DOJ (Department of Justice) has taken the position that the Wire Act covers all forms of gambling, courts have ruled that it is limited to bets on sports events and races. State anti-gambling statutes have similar weaknesses, including the presumption that they do not apply if part of the activity takes place overseas. This new statute requires that the Internet gambling be “unlawful.” But it would often be difficult to find a federal, state or tribal law that clearly made a specific Internet bet illegal.”
Internet gambling has become a $12 billion industry with more than 2,300 current web sites. The Wire Act, created in 1961, was intended to assist states, territories, and possessions of the United States, as well as the District of Columbia, in enforcing their respective laws on gambling and bookmaking and to suppress organized gambling activity.
Last year, the WTO (World Trade Organization) ruled that the United States could ban Internet gaming within its borders, although it still allowed horse race betting and state lotteries. Fantasy football leagues will remain legal, but will be subject to certain restrictions. The new law also allows removal of links from search engines to online real-money sites. Bush is expected to sign the bill within the next two weeks.
Read More
| I. Nelson Rose Article via Casino City Times
- Related Tags:
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
© Gear Live Inc. – User-posted content, unless source is quoted, is licensed under a Creative Commons Public Domain License. Gear Live graphics, logos, designs, page headers, button icons, videos, articles, blogs, forums, scripts and other service names are the trademarks of Gear Live Inc.
Digg This




Comments:
I’m not a big gambler; hell I’m not even a small time gambler but this just helps in my arguement that riders should be disallowed. This is attached to a bill that has to do with terrorism and port security, not even related to the internet, communications or networking—Who would vote against the bill for safer borders even if they were strongly opposed to the rider item? No one, that would make them look like they hate America in the eyes of their constituents. One issue per bill…no more sneaking these small unrelated items onto bills you know stand no chance of being questioned or countered.
Reply to this: comment | thread
I’m not a gambler either but the internet gambling ban passed by Congress begs the question: Do Americans live in a free country or not?
Bill First, U.S. Senator, says it passed because members of the pro-family movement brought the issue forward. Obviously the senator and his band of Christian Talibans would rather it NOT be a free country.
Reply to this: comment | thread
The other major impact of the gambling bill, and the resulting exodus by some of the most responsible, licensed operators, is the effect on players - as the industry goes underground, it leaves us more unprotected than ever.
We have formed a coalition to fight the gambling ban - Poker Patriots. Poker Patriots will strive to create a community of players and advocates with a purpose - to reverse the Unlawful Internet Gambling Enforcement Act and demand the US government license and regulate the industry.
It is inherent in all American poker players to defend their rights against the special interests that created the bill and become Poker Patriots. We call on them to join the fight for the right to play at http://www.pokerpatriots.com.
Thanks,
Doug Savoy
Poker Patriot
Reply to this: comment | thread
Comments: Page 1 of 1 pages