On Gear Live: Samsung S95C: The OLED TV You Can’t Afford (to Ignore!)

Monday June 15, 2009 10:34 pm

Early Reviews for Transformers: Revenge Of The Fallen

Transformers: Revenge of the Fallen

Do you like your movies loud, big, long and mindless? Then it sounds like might be for you. Unfortunately, it wasn’t the ticket for some who’ve had the chance to watch it so far.

The movie doesn’t debut in the United States until June 24, but it’ll hit the UK on June 19. Here are few of the early reviews:

Hollywood Reporter:  “With its intelligence at the level of the simple-minded, however, the film is not likely to attract moviegoers who seek something more than a screen filled with kaleidoscopes of colored metal. Fan boys will no doubt love it, but for the uninitiated it’s loud, tedious and, at 147 minutes, way too long.”

Daily Mirror:  “Star Trek might have had more spaceships and aliens and Terminator: Salvation more grim-faced robots, but this Michael Bay summer blockbuster is pure mindless adventure mayhem that sticks firm and hard to its winning formula. In truth, it is a film for teen boys - and a bloomin’ long one at that - but is also a guaranteed multiplex crowd pleaser. Saying that, for the most part it is also a complex lumbering mess of a movie that is long on turgid backstory and short on tension, laughs and subtle acting.”

News of the World:  “It’s bigger. Badder. Boobier. And many other words beginning with B, including boneheadedly brilliant….Rest assured if you enjoyed the original, as I did, you’ll love the hell out of this.”

Variety:  “With machines that are impressively more lifelike, and characters that are more and more like machines, Transformers: Revenge of the Fallen takes the franchise to a vastly superior level of artificial intelligence. As for human intelligence, it’s primarily at the service of an enhanced arsenal of special effects, which helmer Michael Bay deploys like a general launching his very own shock-and-awe campaign on the senses. Otherwise, little seems new compared to the first installment, except that this version is longer, louder, and perhaps ‘more than your eye can meet’ in one sitting. It will reap similar B.O. rewards worldwide.”

IGN:  “The biggest movie of the summer is finally here, but that’s the problem with Transformers: Revenge of the Fallen - it’s just too bloody big. Epic, spectacular but unfortunately far, far too long; the film proves that when it comes to Michael Bay blockbuster movies, you can have too much of a good thing.”

SciFiNow:  “The film plays out like a three-hour Saturday morning cartoon (it’s about 147 minutes long, but it feels longer). It’s paper-thin all the way through, with nothing in the way of characterisation or invention, just misjudged joke after misjudged joke (don’t be surprised to see a Constructicon’s testicles or a Decepticon humping Megan Fox’s leg), danger-less explosion after danger-less explosion and the sort of expositional exchanges that would make a ten-year-old wince. There are arguably one or two surprises but immediately these are followed up with the most formulaic, predictable plot-points, sucking the life out of any drama or tension there might be like a 200 foot vacuum-cleaner Decepticon, which, incidentally, does feature, as does a regular-size vacuum cleaner Decepticon.”

Advertisement

Comments:

So it’s pretty much what we were expecting?

Well, sounds good to me. It’s Transformers. Just give me giant, fighting robots that transform into cool stuff and I’m happy.

I saw this movie at the midnight showing when it released and all I can say is that it was a bad ass flick. I would gladly pay to see it again.

Advertisement

Commenting is not available in this channel entry.

Advertisement

{solspace:toolbar}